top of page

TAKE ACTION

GET INVOLVE NOW!!!
QUEST FOR BIAFRA FREEDOM IS A COLLECTIVE EFFORT NOT INDIVIDUAL. 

GET INVOLVE TO RESTORE OUR NATION.
​

NIGERIA: BRITAIN’S CREATION HANDED OVER TO THE FULANI

To create Nigeria, the BritIsh engaged in a military campaign to suppress Biafra and other indigenous nation-states. Their initial approach was to rule and administrate each nation state separately as “protectorates”. This was found to be problematic because of the additional administrative costs that this approach created for the British and also because some protectorates were much less economically viable than others. There was also a threat posed by the French Territory that would become Niger as the people there had much more in common with the protectorate of Northern Nigeria than the rest of Nigeria did. Speedily, the protectorates were consolidated, the last of which took place on 1st of January 1914 where the Northern Nigeria Protectorate was amalgamated with Southern Nigeria Protectorate.

In 1962, shortly after independence, the data collection process began for the Nigerian state’s first official census. Waziri Ibrahim, then head of the Economic Development Ministry, said that year

“It is our duty as a nation to see to it that we produce census results which have been thoroughly conducted, verified, and appraised, and therefore acceptable without a shadow of a doubt, to all governments of the world and to all international bodies such as the United Nations and its agencies, the World Bank, etc… The impressions of the manner in which the country conducts its affairs are one of the factors which earn for it the respect or disrespect of the rest of the world ” .

The first of many signs of problems was that well after completion of the census, results were not published. After conflicting preliminary numbers were released, there were suspicions that Northern Nigeria was either inflating its population or reducing the figures published by Southern regions. The census was repeated in 1963 in hopes of producing more accurate reports, but this ended with sharper disagreement. Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa, who was also chairman of the Census Board, declared in 1964 the acceptance of the 1963 results. Eastern and Mid-Western Nigeria rejected the census results. Eastern Nigeria contested in the Federal Supreme Court that taking such action, considering that census responsibility in Nigeria was shared between Federal and Regional governments, was unconstitutional and counter-productive. The census results showed 29.78 million people in Northern Nigeria, 12.39 million people in Eastern Nigeria, 10.28 million people in Western Nigeria, and 2.53 million people in Mid-Western Nigeria. In the words of Aluko, “The interregional controversy arising from the 1963 census was more than enough to justify its rejection, had the Prime Minister not quickly announced its acceptance before the criticisms and defects had been fully debated” (1965).

It is no secret that the population of Nigeria has remained a politicized matter. The 2006 census for example showed that Kano and Lagos state had similar numbers of people (approximately 9 million), but a parallel census conducted by Lagos state in cooperation with the National Population commission pinpointed the state’s population at 17.5 million. In 2013 the head of the National Population Commission (NPC), Festus Odimegwu, said that neither the 2006 federal census nor any previous federal census had been accurate and resigned. In fact, since independence in 1960, four censuses have been entirely aborted for similar reasons.There is reason to suspect that the early census results were molded by British interests to give Northern Nigeria the greatest amount of representation in the Federal government and also that these census results were used as a basis for all other population distribution studies in Nigeria (including the contemporary kind modeled in software). Using common sense alone, the suggestion that there are more people in the drier, land-locked North than in the greener and more coastal South is tantamount to suggesting that more people live in states like Wyoming than Florida.

Professor David Anderson, Director of the African Studies Centre at Oxford University had this to say about British foreign policy regarding political processes in Nigeria: “In almost every single colony the British attempted to manipulate the result to their advantage.... I would be surprised if they had not done so” [in Nigeria]. These census results are not inconsequential. Today in Nigeria the results are reflected in many facets of the federal government such as the make-up of the national legislature, distribution of federal funding to each state, or that nine of Nigeria’s fifteen heads of state have been from Northern Nigeria. In the following video, Harold Smith confesses the British government’s manipulative intentions for Nigeria.

Below is a directory of Nigeria’s military schools and their respective locations. It is immediately observable that most of Nigeria’s designated military schools are based in Northern Nigeria. With the training institutions so too goes representation in upper ranks of the military. In the video below, senator Victor Umeh from Anambra sheds some light on this. The critical access to defense hardware such as rifles or military vehicles follows this same trend. In a state like Nigeria where the federal government is dominated by one particular section of the country, this presents a risk for the machinery of the state to be wrongfully used during sectarian rifts.

School

Location

Air Force Military School

Jos (North)

Armed Forces Command and Staffing College

Jaji (North)

Nigerian Army College of Logistics

Lagos (South West)

Nigerian Defense Academny

Kaduna (North)

Nigerian Military School

Zaria (North)

Nigerian Navy Secondary School

Lagos (South West)

In many cases, the Nigerian military is suspected to be playing partisan roles in sectarian disturbances. On the 25th of March 2018, former Army Chief of Staff Theophilus Danjuma, in a commencement address at Taraba State University, warned about this phenomena. This must be born in mind when one examines certain groups such as Boko Haram and more recently the Fulani Herdsmen who have now killed more people than Boko Haram and placed Nigeria in 3rd rank in the Global Terrorism Index . Two pertinent questions one must ask are: Why does the federal government hesitate to confront this group? Also, from where exactly do these armed groups (Fulani Herdsmen or Boko Haram) obtain their firearms? In the video below, T.Y. Danjuma, a retired general, speaks openly to answer these questions.

TY Danjuma's warning on Nigerian military's collusion with Fulani Herdsmen

 

Usman Baba Ngelzarma: Myetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association National Secretary (left) and Fulani Herdsmen (right)

In Danjuma’s statement he says that “Taraba is a mini-state; it is a mini-Nigeria”, meaning what happened in Taraba is microcosm of what is happening in Nigeria in general. Olusegun Obasanjo echoed Danjuma and added more detail when he later honestly described the Herdsmen’s agenda saying “it is now West African Fulanization, African Islamization and global organized crimes of human trafficking, money laundering, drug trafficking, gun trafficking, illegal mining and regime change”. Attacks have even begun to take place in Biafraland. On the morning of 6th of May 2019, Fulani herdsmen attacked in Owerri, killing 2. Equally alarming is that instead of aggressively confronting this threat, while innocent people are murdered in their homes, the federal government has curiously begun implementing a disarmament campaign. This campaign not only targets suspected criminals but also critical vigilante groups and neighborhood security organizations. In doing so they are removing the only reliable line of defense people have to ensure some basic amount of security that is in their direct control. This is the ethnic cleansing and Fulanization to which Danjuma and Obasanjo refer as the government renders whole communities vulnerable so that Herdsmen can overrun them. Biafrans will not sit idly for these events to sweep our land.

Untitled design (15).png

WHAT IS WRONG WITH NIGERIA?

Nigeria was created under the management of Fredrick Lugard, a mercenary sent to subjugate African people and impose trade, in 1914. Working on behalf of the British government, and for their own selfish economic reasons, he amalgamated the vast territory with different indigenous states and referred to it as Nigeria(River Niger and the Area surrounding it). Lugard’s successor, Hugh Clifford, noted his personal doubts about amalgamation by describing it as an exercise in “mixing oil with water”. However this was the least of British concerns as they regarded Nigeria solely as a place of economic interest, with little or no regard at all for the welfare of the indigenous populations that inhabited the area. 

Social and economic conditions in Nigeria have deteriorated considerably. According to The Economist, Nigerians are twice as likely to be poor today as they were in 1980. A staggering 70% of the country’s population lives in extreme poverty. Government workers are working months without pay; protesters are regularly killed or kidnapped by government security officers and still the central power infrastructure is not reliable. There are few people are unaware of Nigeria’s major challenges such as corruption, lawlessness, government impunity, lack of economic development, or disregard of human rights, but what is very often overlooked is that these issues are symptoms of a more fundamental problem, which is that Nigeria is composed of peoples with diverging value systems. In Northern and Western Nigeria there is a heavy emphasis on deferment to centralized authority for everything. In Northern Nigeria it is primarily because of the tenants of Islam while in Western Nigeria it is due to the systems of monarchy. In Biafra by contrast, autonomy and freedom are cultural pillars. M.M. Green observed that “This great people is broken up into … independent social units”. M.D.W Jeffreys, an administrative officer in the area noted that “There is no individual whom the tribe as a whole regard as a ruler or as a person endowed with divine powers. There is no tradition that there ever was such as a person”. Charles Partridge wrote that the region contained “tribes of about equal power [Igbo, Ibibio, Ijaw, etc.] and entirely independent of one another”.

Another sign of sharp contrast within Nigeria is nomenclature. Where other countries refer to different parts of their country as regions, in Nigeria they are referred to as “geopolitical zones”. The term “geopolitical” conjures images of nations pitting themselves against one another in a zero-sum game of power, prestige, and war. This language permeates everything from academic publications to news broadcasts and announcements. The word “zone” invokes images of sections of a military base or even a maximum security prison. Language alone can be dismissed as a frivolity. However, when one scrutinizes policy, it is clear that instead of leading the nation as one politicians monopolize the Nigerian state to benefit certain ethnic or cultural groups, the result of which is the disproportionate struggle of other sections of the country. Capital resources are allocated on a basis that gives advantage to some regions while suppressing others. An example of this is that the South East geopolitical zone (which is part of Biafra’s hinterland region) was allocated the least number of local governments and states, which grants it access to the least amount of federal capital. The South East geopolitical zone is the only zone in Nigeria with 5 states. Infrastructure is built and maintained in some regions but not others. To demonstrate, one can examine the constantly discussed Second Niger Bridge which has yet to be constructed in the 50 years since the end of the war or the recent high speed rail project that will connect Lagos with Kano, Kaduna, Warri, Bauchi, Abuja, and Igweocha, bypassing all cities in the South East. The South East is in fact the only zone left out of that rail project. Local resources are directly used for national purposes without the owners of the land benefiting such as the oil and gas in the Delta Region. The federal government has also done little to ensure that environmental conditions are maintained at an acceptable standard. An estimated 240,000 barrels of crude oil consistently spills in this region each year. This is the equivalent of an Exxon Valdez oil spill every 5 years for the last several decades. Nigeria ranks amongst the top 10 nations in infant mortality, but what studies now show is that infant mortality is doubled to 76 still births for every 1000 births in the vicinity of oil spills. That is a still birth rate close to 1 in 10.

Marginalization of Biafra (SE or SS), whether characterized by cheating in the federal allocation formula, monopolization of local resources, or environmental neglect and its consequences on health is built into federal policy. The vast majority of investments in Eastern Nigeria, particularly the South East, are made by native Easterners. Logically, it is difficult for people to justify coming to this region for industrial or economic reasons. Eastern ports, Onitsha, Igweocha, Warri, and Calabar all no longer export goods and have fallen into disrepair. If one is somehow able to overcome this challenge the poor conditions of federal roads in the East make it difficult to move goods from ports to major markets throughout the region and beyond. Biafra has been systematically and deliberately de-industrialized since 1970 by focusing federal investments away from it. To work in real industry Biafran people more or less has to leave the region.

Nigeria’s federal government has become an avenue to elevate some peoples while suppressing others. The reason for this degeneration is that the politicians know that Nigeria is not their home. Rather, their home is one of the indigenous nations forced into Nigeria. It was the Northern Premier Ahmadu Bello that said, “The new nation called Nigeria should be an estate of our great grandfather Uthman Dan Fodio. We must ruthlessly prevent a change of power. We use the minorities in the North as willing tools and the South as a conquered  territory and never allow them to have control over their future”. In the following video, Ahmadu Bello expounds on his perceptions of Biafrans, Igbos specifically.

Obafemi Awolowo said, “Nigeria is not a Nation. It a mere geographical expression”. The first Prime Minister of Nigeria, Tafawa Balewa, said in 1948, “Since 1914 the British Government has been trying to make Nigeria into one country, but the Nigerian people themselves are historically different in their backgrounds, in their religious beliefs, and customs and do not show themselves any willingness to unite”. When one scrutinizes the political situation closely within Nigeria, movements toward sovereignty are visible and maintain a consistent presence in each of these nations - Oduduwa People’s Congress, Oodua Republic Front, Islamic Movement of Nigeria, Boko Haram, MEND, Biafra Zionist Movement, MASSOB just to name a few. They all seek one thing in common: self determination, although they employ vastly different methods of achieving it (Boko Haram is the most extreme case of this).

Many of the Fulani decision-makers in Nigeria are of the rarely spoken position that the dissipation of Nigeria’s problems will begin with Nigeria’s universal embrace of Islam. 12 states have already implemented Sharia Law in all aspects of their society and even have written it into their state constitutions. Sharia and Islam are even mentioned in the Nigerian constitution despite Nigeria supposedly being secular. Nigeria is also a member of OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation). Publicly, Muslim leaders in Nigeria have stated that Sharia Law is only for Muslims, but many of them have also expressed intentions to make every Nigerian a Muslim. Muhammadu Buhari has expressed such

 

intentions, but is this really the solution? For Biafrans, Islam has all too often brought violence and suppression of basic rights with it. Historically, when there have been riots in Northern Nigeria Christians are targeted, and most of those Christians have been Biafran. Below is a brief list of these violent events and the respective Biafran death toll estimates. Reading this list one must bear in mind that life is cheap in a country like Nigeria. A blind eye is often turned by the media to murder that has ethnic, religious, or political implications:

Jos - 1945 - 300 and millions of dollars in property destroyed (In response to Nnamdi Azikiwe’s strike against British)
Kano - 1953 - 200 (In response to their perception that their politicians were disrespected in Ibadan)
Northern Nigeria - 1966 - 200,000
Northern Nigeria - 1967 - 100,000
Biafra - 1967~1970 - 3.5 million and Billions of dollars damaged or stolen property
Kano - 1980 - Thousands
Maiduguri - 1982
Jimeta - 1984
Gombe - 1985
Zaria - 1987
Kaduna, Katsina, Bauchi - 1991
Kano - 1992
Zango-Kataf - 1993
Funtua - 1993
Kano - 1994 (A Biafran business man Gideon Akaluka beheaded in prison because his wife was accused of desecrating the Quran)
Kano - 2001 (Biafran truck driver killed because the exhaust of his truck desecrated the Quran)
Northern Nigeria - 2001 (Biafran Isioma comments that Mohammad could have married some beauty pageant contestants. After a fatwa as issued on her she fled Nigeria)
Kano - 2003 - 7 (Rev. Sunday Madumere and six members of his family killed)
Maiduguri - 2006 - Hundreds (Muslims protesting Danish cartoonist kill Igbo and other Christians, burn down churches and loot their homes and property)
Jos - 2008
Maiduguri,Yobe, Bauchi, Kano - 2009 - 1000+ (Boko Haram kill Christians in Northern Nigeria including pastors such as George Orji who was beheaded)
Bauchi - December 30, 2009 - (Muslims kill 100 Christians, including several Igbo and burn down churches and property)
Jos - January 7, 2010 - 200 (Boko Haram kills Christians mostly Igbo traders at the Dimi market and on Bauchi Road)
Abuja - December 25, 2011 - 100 (St. Theresa Church bombing)
Northern Nigeria - March 16th 2011 - 1500 (Biafran Christians, traders and youth corps members killed by Muslims. They also burned down 400 churches. Buhari, Nigeria’s incumbent ruler, incited the violence. )
Adamawa - January 5, 2012 - 50 (Muslims kill 50 Igbos. The first 16 victims were murdered on Friday night at the Christ Apostolic Church in Yola during a Christian service. The others were killed by Boko Haram at the home of another Igbo as they were planning the funeral of those murdered on Friday)
Mubi - January 12, 2012 - 60 (Boko Haram kills Igbo residents planning the funeral of another Igbo man killed earlier)
Kano - March 19, 2013 - 250 (Igbos killed by Boko Haram bomb in bus station)
Kano - July 29, 2013 - 4 (Boko Haram kills Igbo Nnamdi Ezebuala and his 3 children)
Jos - September 3, 2013 - 5 (Boko Haram kills Igbo Christians that refuse to renounce their faith)
Onitsha - December 2, 2015 - 9 (Nigerian soldiers kill 9 Biafrans including a 21 year old girl Anthonia Nkiruka)
Onitsha - December 17, 2015 - Nigerian soldiers abduct dead and wounded from earlier incident
Aba - February 9, 2016 - 10 (Nigerian soldiers kill 10 Biafrans and wound many at a prayer service)

Below is a photo of a mass grave of Biafrans killed by the Nigerian Police on May 30, 2016 during a peaceful protest. Following that is a list of some of those slaughtered. This incident was so egregious that Amnesty International publicly demanded that Willie Obiano task an investigation on this. To date both he and officials in the federal government have produced nothing. Further down are photos of some of the terrors that Biafrans experience as part of day to day life in Nigeria.

DONATE NOW

COMING SOON

bottom of page